|
JEAN SHIN

- Jean Shin, Armed,
2005
- Fabric (military
uniforms from US soldiers), thread and starch
- Wall 24 x 14 feet,
Hanging piece 24 x 6 x 2 feet
- Installation view
in exhibition Fear Gear at Roebling Hall, New York City
- Courtesy the artist
and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
John LeKay:
The scale of your piece entitled "Armed" is very striking. It's approximately
24ft by 14ft high. The accompanying hanging sculptural piece is also of the
same scale length wise, more or less. There seems to be a methodical element to
this piece as well as your other work. How important is the process of finding
materials to make your work and how do you usually go about doing this?
Jean Shin:
The process
of
accumulating my materials is an extremely
significant part of my work. In each project, I’m bringing together diverse
individuals within a community that are connected by a common material they
all have in their lives.
In the piece
Armed, I
worked with the director of Harbor Defense Museum at
Fort Hamilton, Paul Morando to find soldiers
who would be interested in donating their uniforms for my project. It was
extremely helpful to have a member of
the
community support the project and become an informal collaborator. In many
cases, I traveled all over the New York area to pick
up the uniforms.
This process gave me the
opportunity to
personally meet many of
the soldiers and
hear their stories. The conversations
I had
with soldiers in the Army, Airforce, Navy, Coast
Guard, Reserves and Vets were interesting
parts
of my research.
They told me
what
wearing their uniforms means to them and shared
their
experiences of serving in the military.
JL: What was
the experience like of meeting all the soldiers and hearing their stories; and what
were their responses to seeing the finished piece?
JS. I was
pleasantly surprised by my encounters
with the many individuals who
have
served in the military. Many older
vets were very emotional when
describing their
experiences, especially if they remembered a close buddy
whom
they had
lost during combat. Some of the military personnel I spoke
with
wear their uniforms with great pride;
yet at the same time they
are extremely
critical of the current administration’s role in Iraq.
Several reserves who were in Iraq on
peace-keeping
missions felt a great sense of purpose and yet
struggled with
the complex reality of their
military
presence there.
The notion of
camouflage in relationship to today’s military fascinates
me. In most situations today, the United States’ so-called ‘military presence’
is about visibility--the exact opposite function that camouflage was designed
for.
And yet
the uniforms still bear the
camouflage
pattern—one meant to hide, blend in and obscure.
Military uniforms have a “dehumanizing” quality to them as well.
On the one hand, they
take away a person’s
individuality, but
on the other
they also function as a blank canvas
onto which
individuals can project
their different, and
even contradictory, beliefs and opinions. For
example, many Americans may view military uniforms as positive symbols of
patriotism, leadership, and sacrifice. The same uniforms may
evoke
negative connotations of power, fear, and terror for
others.
I think those
soldiers who
were
willing to take the
time to donate their
uniforms to an art project are a select group of very open-minded and generous
individuals. Overall they were very touched that I took an interest
in
them and excited that there was a
place
where their old uniforms would have a second purpose.
The soldiers who saw the installation were enthusiastic as they tried
to identify which pieces came from their
own
uniforms—it was a
very personal
experience
for them. They
responded very positively and felt proud to have contributed to an art work.
JL. I
sense something else about this piece - the way the uniforms are cut and pasted
like camouflaged wall paper.
Also, the
way the hanging sculptural piece resembles a hovering helicopter made out
of camouflaged shreds. It is as if you have deliberately stripped
the uniforms of their symbolism and power by re -contextualizing the camouflaged costumes in an
artistic and conspicuous way. Was this a part of your intention and does it
relate to when you said, "so-called 'military presence' is about visibility--the
exact opposite function that camouflage was designed for…yet
the uniforms still bear the
camouflage
pattern—one meant to hide, blend in and obscure."
JS. I’m definitely thinking about wallpaper. Both wallpaper and camouflage
address issues of visibility—creating an environment
in which
a figure becomes
integral to and even sometimes
indistinguishable from
its surroundings.
I was also fascinated by the close historic relationship between
camouflage and landscape that seems to be inherent in the colors.
My installation moves from greens (jungle and
vegetation) to dark blues (water), to beiges and
browns (desert and earth), then to pale blue and grey (sky)—the
piece as
a whole suggests the various striations of a military
landscape.
For me, the
hanging piece brings to mind
military nets or
tents. But I’m always interested to hear the different associations that
viewers have with my work--each interpretation bringing something new to it,
creating a personal experience for each individual.

- Jean Shin,
Chemical Balance, 2005
- Prescription
bottles, mirror and epoxy
- Dimensions
Variable
- Courtesy the artist
and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
JL. How did
you collect all the bottles to make "Chemical Balance"?
When I was
working on Chemical Balance, I sent
out emails to everyone I knew asking them to participate in the project by
donating their emptied prescription pill bottles. In the beginning of the
collection
process, I found it difficult to convince
people to participate because of the sensitivity of the information on these
Rx pill bottles. I encouraged people to cross out any
personal data or remove the labels to get around this problem. My
New
York gallery Frederieke Taylor
and venues where the work would be shown (Sculpture
Center and the University Art Museum in Albany) helped to spread the word and
both served as
drop off points
for several months. I also received hundreds of Rx vials from local pharmacies
and nursing homes. Everyday at the studio I would get packages from individuals
sending me their emptied pill vials. Throughout
the process, it was amazing to have so many
conversations with people about their health and their dependency, temporary or
long term, on prescription drugs
JL. Like your
other work, there are many interpretations and associations that one can
make. In the case of Chemical Balance, could one of them be a social commentary
on our culture's dependency, excessive use of pharmaceuticals and magic bullet
mentality?
JS. That’s a great
interpretation of Chemical Balance. I’m amazed by the effectiveness of
pharmaceutical drugs to alter the chemical balance of our body,
whether for temporary relief or lifelong dependencies.
Perhaps we live in a consumer society that is
over medicated, always in search of the
instant
cure. At the same time, for many whose
well-beings
are chemically dependent on these drugs,
it’s a
love-hate relationship of dependency--a
constant battle between gratitude and resentment.

- Jean Shin and Brian
Ripel, Glasscape, 2005
- Wine bottles and
silicone
- Dimensions Variable
- Courtesy of the
Artist and Eric Dupont Gallery, Paris
-
-

Detail of Glassscape
JL. What
inspired the
"Glasscape" piece you collaborated on with architect
Brian Ripel? Also where did you get all the wine bottles from and do you have
any anecdotes about the collecting or installation process?
JS.
Glasscape
was a variation on a project we did in 2003
at Smack Mellon Gallery in New York called Glass Block.
At that
particular time, the government had stopped its
recycling program
in New York City. Each
evening after enjoying a bottle of wine during dinner, my husband Brian
and I were discussing how disappointing it was that
the city couldn’t find a good way to re-use
this material. What could we do with glass
wine bottles--transforming both their purpose
and properties? When Smack Mellon invited us to make a work for the exhibition,
we decided to take on that challenge with this question in mind.
We decided to block up the entrance of the gallery with a wall of stacked wine
bottles. This gesture redirects the path of the viewers
and offers them a different experience of
the
gallery’s architectural space. When they
arrive on the opposite
side,
the blocked opening appears more like a
colorful stained glass window filled with
light.
In Paris, we
recognized
just how
integral wine is to
the cultural heritage as well as the
physical
landscape of France. In Glasscape (2005),
the installation reveals the underlying beauty of this familiar object when
amassed, while suggesting a luminous landscape of glass. The bottles---emptied
and cleaned—had been collected from
neighborhood restaurants and bars in Paris. My
Paris
gallery dealer
Eric Dupont
collected the bottles months in advance from his
friends who own wine bars and restaurants. Others came from his personal
consumption. The flat bottoms of the bottles became
a translucent
mosaic
of dynamic
circular
patterns, transmitting
various pixels of colored light into the gallery; while the protruding bottle
necks, wrapped in colorful labels on the opposite side,
appear as an impenetrable, opaque obstruction. The French audience was very
interested in reading the labels on the bottles. Their commenting
on the name, region and year
of each bottle was
surprising to me since this hadn’t been the case in New York.

- Jean Shin,
Chance City, 2001-2004
- $21,496 worth of
discarded lottery tickets (no adhesive)
- 6 x 8 x 8 feet,
Installation at Brooklyn Museum
- Courtesy the artist
and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
-

Chance City, 2005
-
$21,496 worth of
discarded lottery tickets (no adhesive), 6 x 8 x 8 feet
-
Installation at
Brooklyn Museum
JL. "Chance City"
looks like a very challenging installation, since you used no adhesive. Did you
attain the tickets in various stacks of color and did you actually calculate the
$21,496 worth of discarded lottery tickets yourself?
JS.
While all my work is
labor-intensive, Chance City
in particular is a
piece that is especially so. All the lottery tickets
are scratched-off
tickets that I accumulated
from several vendors over a couple of years. Once I had collected
thousands of them in my studio, I organized them
according to color and counted the exact dollar amount of each stack. During
the on-site installation, it takes me several days to build the towers like a
house of cards. I wanted the sculpture to have
similar issues of risk and chance that are two factors integral to
playing the lottery. The cards are held
up
by both
gravity and
friction, remaining vulnerable to chance and
the possibility that the towers could fall. I
like to think that
the installation is
held together by pure human desire, just as the daily
ritual of playing the lotto comes out of the fantasy of winning a million
dollars instantly. Unfortunately, the reality is just the opposite—hundreds
and thousands of dollars lost in wishful thinking.
- Jean Shin,
Penumbra, 2003
- Fabric (broken
umbrellas) and thread, 72 x 45 x variable height
- Installation at
Socrates Sculpture Park, Long Island City, NY
JL.
In Penumbra, was
there anything in particular that sparked the making this piece and where did
you find all the umbrellas?
JS. I remember walking in New York after a heavy rain storm and seeing dozens
of broken umbrellas abandoned on the street.
After
the storm had passed,
I started to rescue these tragic objects.
In New York in particular, we use an abundant amount of cheap black and dark
umbrellas—it seems like they’re in fact
designed for this
very kind of
casual
disposability. I wanted to re-introduce the umbrellas
back to the outdoor elements, except
this time
to interact with the sun and gentle
wind.
Penumbra creates protection from the sun—welcome
shade
amidst
the
summer’s heat at Socrates Sculpture Park. While the canopy of umbrellas moves
gently with the breeze, it creates
a
mesmerizing play of shadows on the grass
beneath.
JL. Is any of
the creative process deliberately left to the element of chance in terms of the
accumulation of materials, reconstruction and composition, the use of color and
the execution in this piece and your other works in general?
JS.
There are certainly different elements of chance in my work—some more overt
than others. When I set out to accumulate certain
objects inviting a certain community to save or donate objects or clothing for
the next installation, it’s unpredictable exactly what
and how much I
will end up with. This
unknown
variable in the collection process
in turn
informs my
creative
process and of course the final outcome. There is lots of labor intensive
experimentation with these castoff materials in my studio.
I’ve found
that there’s a fine balance of imposing a deliberate
intention onto the objects
and listening to
what they want to do intrinsically or become by
chance. Furthermore, once the objects have
been reconfigured
into a new context, the final
phase of installing the work on site is again a
very intuitive response to form, space, color and composition.
Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
www.frederieketaylorgallery.com
|