Home

Contributors

Environment

Sculpture

Celluloid

Paintings

Fotos Q&A Dance Music Video

 Translation

Inner Vision

Psych Fashion Panorama

Features

Wordsmiths Art Views Health Contact About us
more PANORAMA
Sister Dianna Ortiz
The Sky TV Interview

PANORAMA

 

 

Crimes against Humanity

Bush and Blair give the green-light.

 

The New York Times ran a photograph of a dead Lebanese mother cradling her dead child under the rubble, a picture does paint a thousand words, and I think we all knew what we were staring at. Terror is terror, and by definition, is sanctioned and committed by terrorists. It makes no matter if the order came from Tel Aviv, Washington, or militants in the Bekah valley, and I don’t suppose an innocent civilian would be comforted knowing that at least his brains were going to be splattered by an official state, using precision-guided missiles supplied by the leader of the free world.

 

The offensive and invasion of Lebanon was as wanton, as it was barbaric, criminally disproportionate, and shamefully backed by the US and UK alliance. The IDF committed a campaign of indiscriminate high altitude bombing, treating innocent civilians as sub-human creatures, not deemed worthy for protection by the universal standards of human rights. In the space of four weeks the IDF were responsible for escalating an orgy of violence that has killed 1,300 of our fellow human beings. They created 750,000 refugees, demolished wholes cities in southern Lebanon, destroyed infrastructure of a nation, and inflamed the entire region for the release of two captured Israeli soldiers! Are these the actions of a civilized nation and our ally?  I certainly don’t think so; they are the actions of a government, devoid of moral sense, guilt or responsibility. They are the prima facie war crimes committed by an Israeli government against the innocent civilians of Lebanon, and yes the Hezbollah response of lobbing rockets into northern Israel is also a blatant war crime.

 

The fact though, that Hezbollah crossed into Israel to kill Israeli soldiers, did not give Israel the right to chastise the entire civilian population of southern Lebanon. When the IRA would cross the Irish border to kill British soldiers, the government of the United Kingdom did not order air strikes on the village of Donegal or begin a full blown ground invasion of Dublin!

We all waited for the United States to speak up; surely the standard bearer for human rights would stand up to this mad affront to the civilized world you asked?  The US is always the first to speak out on China’s human rights abuse, or to point out Russia’s abuse of international law. The US would not allow Israel to trash international law, or hurl the Geneva Convention out the window without condemning it, would they? The first few days of Israel’s offensive was met by a deafening silence from Washington, not a word. It took 11 days before Condoleezza Rice was sent to the region, where she philosophically pointed out that a short term ceasefire “would be meaningless”; meaningless to whom?  Is it meaningless to the 750,000 refugees, meaningless to the wounded victims of phosphorus? the civilians living like rats underground? Or to the mothers of children murdered by cluster bombs?  www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/07/24/isrlpa13798.htm                                                              

 

 

 

 

 

Condoleezza Rice, drunk with power, arrived in Rome to meet with UN, EU, and Middle East officials. Ms Rice then served up more mindless pulp; “We have to have a plan that will actually create conditions in which we can have a cease-fire that will be sustainable," the translation from zombie into English is; we (the US) will complicity stall a ceasefire at the UN, giving Israel ample time to decimate Lebanon and finish off Hezbollah, and if you think that we’re going to let a few hundred inconveniently dead women and children get in our way, then look out, here’s another American made missile with your name on it.

 

Then the world was rudely awakened by the news that Israel had committed a war crime in Qana. The IDF slammed an American made missile into the building, killing 28 civilians; mostly women and children who were sleeping in the basement.  They were crushed and suffocated under the rubble. Rescue workers were overcome with emotion, as they pulled out the little bodies of children from the bricks and sand. They wrapped the bodies in plastic bags and when they ran out of bags, they wrapped the dead children in carpets. The families were terrified of leaving town for fear of being hit on the road by Israeli air strikes; they couldn’t afford the $1,000 for the cost of taxis, and instead, gathered in the basement. New York based Human Rights Watch called this the “"latest product" of Israel's indiscriminating bombing. http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/08/02/lebano13899.htm      

   

In the face of this carnage, with so many children’s lives cut short. The fanatical President Bush and his pathetically compromised side kick Tony Blair still couldn’t bring themselves to call for an immediate ceasefire! These children are dead because Bush and Blair were busy playing diplomatic word games to ensure that Israel could continue their air campaign. The US and UK governments made it painfully obvious, they simply didn’t value Lebanese blood, in fact, they encouraged the IDF to carry on spilling it (an acceptable price), as long as they could simultaneously defeat Hezbollah.

 

With the US acting as handmaiden for a bloody civil war in Iraq, and Israel’s illegal and brutal occupation of Palestine, this latest barbarity in Lebanon was always going to be fraught with danger of engulfing the entire Middle-East in war.  The state sponsored atrocities committed in Lebanon by the IDF, and America’s unflinching support for Israel has been an unmitigated disaster for Israel and for US foreign policy in the region.

 

The Israeli US, and UK government’s played Russian roulette, gambling that the air campaign on Lebanon would cause the Sunni and Christian population to rise up against Hezbollah, (presumably the same wizards who told us the Iraqis would welcome the American troops with flowers) And what a messy backfire! The CIA name for a short term policy that has negative long term ramifications is blowback. Hezbollah are now are the most popular movement in the Islamic world, they have faced down the worlds 4th powerful army, fought them to a standstill, and given them a bloody nose. Their enigmatic leader Sheike Hassan Nasrallah is now perceived as a mythical champion by the Shia, Sunni, and all Arabs, who feel he has restored Islamic pride and dignity. al Qaeda leaders are practically blowing kisses at Hezbollah, united by their complete and utter hatred of the United States and Israel. This could have same emboldening effect for Islamism that the Muhajadeen victory over Soviet forces in Afghanistan did in the 1980’s

.

 

 

 

 

With the region on the verge of a meltdown, Ms. Rice told us not to worry; all we are seeing is the “birth pangs of a New Middle East”

Well, Thanks for setting me straight Condi. Because from my vantage point, it looks like a nasty vicious creature is sticking its head out of the womb of America’s foreign policy, and it’s a very ugly one indeed.

 

 

Back to Top